Lamborghini ESTOQUE : The 4-seater Supercar

The most dramatic Lamborghini since the Espada four-seater from the late 1960s and the first four-door from Sant’ Agata since the outrageous LP002 Hummer-inspirer debuted at the Paris Motor Show and quite clearly walked away as THE show stopper.

Let’s get some sanity into this crazy (for Lamborghini) yet exciting saloon which Lamborghini officially says is only a concept (yet!) but nobody is quite believing that given the high level of engineering already built into the machine displayed in Paris. But then that is Lamborghini and in a world where the movers and shakers want to travel in style with grandeur and luxury at their beck and call, Lamborghini is adding pace to these attributes as well. All Lamborghinis to date have been named after prized fighter bulls from Spain and Italy but this time Lamborghini pulled something else out of the bull ring lexicon to name this gorgeous four-door – the Estoque.

In a world where conspicuous consumption in these troubled days is being pretty well watered down for something more sober and not in your face, Lamborghini wants to take a route which is directly contrarian to that. However being part of the massive VW Group and directly controlled by Audi, there is enough in there to make it mighty relevant for those fat cats wanting to be teleported at seriously high speeds. Lamborghini does things in style but then that has always been its mantra to shock and awe and it was no different at Paris as well. And one style attribute which Lamborghini has made into a near habit in recent times has been its boss man Stephan Winkelmann always being escorted by some of the most gorgeous models to pull the wraps off any new Lambo.

The Estoque is built around an extruded aluminium spaceframe chassis and this is something which its parent Audi has tremendous experience of. Throw in light but super strong carbon fibre bits at critical areas and Lamborghini claims a structure that is stiffer than any other supercar out there.

The Estoque in Paris came equipped with the 560bhp 5.2-litre V10 taken straight out of the Gallardo and planted up front. The engine is mated to a new seven-speed DSG gearbox and this transmits power to all four wheels. The car’s slinky lines denote it to be a 320km/h stunner but Lamborghini officials informed that the Estoque could hit a 275km/h top speed – just the right speed for a four-seater with the raging bull on its nose. Relevance to the situation is what many wondered aloud on first look at the Estoque but Lamborghini has suggested that a diverse range of powerplants are being considered including hybrids and an oil burner!

The Estoque has tremendous presence, from its razor-sharp killer looks to the massive overall length and that mighty 3010mm wheelbase. The low height would have given the designers plenty to think about but the large superstructure has been brilliantly sculpted and while it appears low (and it is low at just 1350mm tall), those large 22 inch wheels on the front coupled to those ultra-wide 23-inch diameter wheels on the rear keep this car firmly planted yet agile enough to spring should the call be given to strike, er take off! Many did ask why Lamborghini didn’t go in for the large coupe look but reinterpreting the classic Espada with its sharp lines did mean that the Estoque had to be faithful to Sant’ Agata traditions.

Getting back to the four-door, four-seater detail though and here is where the real sense begins to emerge, behind its concept and existence. The transmission tunnel quite exquisitely breaks up the interior into four separate zones for as many persons with leg, elbow and shoulder room which Latino supercars have always cried out long for. Factor in a large boot to stack in two golf bags and luggage for the weekend and one can make out why there are car makers wanting to go with top end four-door four-seaters. Porsche has been teasing us all with its four-door four-seater Panamera while Aston Martin has released sketches of its four-door Rapide saloon but here was Lamborghini trumping them all with a car which not only looks razor sharp but is there and waiting to hit the roads. Expect it sometime by 2011.

 

Technical Support : How helpful?

Technical Support guys are known to be a boon to today’s world. But, there are instances when we feel, we would have been better off without them. Here are a few such instances:

 

Instance 1

I had trouble downloading an operating system upgrade for a PDA, so I called tech support.

  • Me: “I can’t seem to get this download to complete. What might be causing it?”
  • Tech Support: “What operating system are you running?”
  • Me: “Windows NT.”
  • Tech Support: “Well, you have to be running Windows 98 or better in order to download it.”
  • Me: “Ummm, I am. I’m running Windows NT4, SP5.”
  • Tech Support: “Are you on a PC or a MAC?”

Instance 2

My school required me to do some of our reports on laptops and print from a single printer. After a few months the laptop they provided me ceased to work with the printer. I spoke with the IT Manager.

  • IT Manager: “I don’t know if the problem is a hardware problem or a software problem.”
  • Me: “Ok.”
  • IT Manager: “So I can’t solve the problem now.”
  • Me: “When can you solve it?”
  • IT Manager: “I told you: I don’t know if it is a hardware problem or a software problem. I can’t fix it until I know.”
  • Me: “Ok. I need to print my reports. When will I be able to?”
  • IT Manager: (angrily) “Look, if it’s a hardware problem I can’t fix it! I don’t know if it is a hardware or a software problem.”

I made several more attempts to communicate with the IT manager about this problem over the next few weeks, only to find myself in the same conversation. Finally, I sent a memo to my boss, explaining that I was having difficulty getting tech support and could not print out my reports. My boss wrote back:

  • Boss: “Please do not harass the IT Manager anymore. He has already explained to you that he doesn’t know whether it is a software problem or a hardware problem.”

Instance 3

There’s this quite major company called Hewlett Packard over here in India. I bought a system from them, and then five months later I hear a “Pfoo!” noise, and my display went all fuzzy and strange.

Here’s the conversation I had with tech support about it, with a lot cut out:

  • Tech Suppport: “What seems to be the problem, sir?”
  • Me: “Well, my screens all fuzzy, and my video card seems to have exploded.”
  • Tech Support: “Well, right click on the desktop.”
  • Me: “Before you say anything, I’ve tried the monitor on another computer, and on this computer on Windows 98, 2000, Linux, and BeOS, and it’s definitely something wrong with the video card, because the monitor worked on the other computers, and it didn’t work in any of the operating systems in this one, and when I tried another video card, it worked.”
  • Tech Support: “Right click on the desktop.”
  • Me: “…”
  • Tech Support: “Right click on the desktop.”
  • Me: “Well, I’m in Linux right now.”
  • Tech Support: “Right click on the desktop.”
  • Me: “I’m not in Windows.”
  • Tech Support: “Right click on the desktop.”
  • Me: “Do you know what an operating system is?”
  • Tech Support: “Yes, sir.”
  • Me: “Ok then, because, I’m not in Windows. I’m in Linux, which is another operating system. Right clicking on the desktop won’t do anything you think it will, I promise. Do you want me to reboot into Windows?”
  • Tech Support: “Right click on the desktop please, sir.”

I sighed, gave up, rebooted into Windows, and right clicked on the desktop.

  • Me: “Do you want me to click on ‘Properties’?”
  • Tech Support: “No sir, please click on ‘Properties’.”
  • Me: “…”

After a while, “we” determined that, no, it isn’t my resolution, and installing new drivers won’t help. After a very long discussion, I learned that to replace my video card, they would “have to” (or so policy dictates) take the entire computer away (monitor and all) for 5-7 business days to replace the faulty video card. I protested this, because the computer was being used in a business. They told me there was “nothing they could do.” This seemed bad enough, but then:

  • Tech Support: “Have you backed up recently?”
  • Me: “No, why?”
  • Tech Support: “You should…”
  • Me: “Sure, ok, I’ll remember.”
  • Tech Support: “…because as part of our policy, when servicing a computer, we delete everything on the hard disk.”
  • Me: “What the $%* *%(@ $%? WHY???”
  • Tech Support: “Company policy.”
  • Me: “But it’s a broken video card! Even you admit that!!! It has nothing to do with the hard drive!”
  • Tech Support: “That’s company policy, sir.”

After about an hour of arguing, we didn’t get anywhere. I am living with the video card up to this day, months later, and was not refunded in anyway.

Turns out to be rather more tragic than funny, actually.

All about Malwares

Malware, a short for malicious software, is a software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the owner’s informed consent. The expression is a general term used by computer professionals to mean a variety of forms of hostile, intrusive, or annoying software or program code.

Many computer users are unfamiliar with the term, and often use “computer virus” for all types of malware, including true viruses. Software is considered malware based on the perceived intent of the creator rather than any particular features. Malware includes computer viruses, worms, trojan horses, most rootkits, spyware, dishonest adware, crimeware and other malicious and unwanted software.

In law, malware is sometimes known as a computer contaminant, for instance in the legal codes of several American states, including California and West Virginia. Malware is not the same as defective software, that is, software which has a legitimate purpose but contains harmful bugs. Preliminary results from Symantec sensors published in 2008 suggested that “the release rate of malicious code and other unwanted programs may be exceeding that of legitimate software applications.”

According to F-Secure, “As much malware (was) produced in 2007 as in the previous 20 years altogether.”

What is its purpose?

Many early infectious programs, including the first Internet Worm and a number of MS-DOS viruses, were written as experiments or pranks generally intended to be harmless or merely annoying rather than to cause serious damage to computers. In some cases the perpetrator did not realize how much harm their creations could do. Young programmers learning about viruses and the techniques used to write them only to prove that they could or to see how far it could spread.

As late as 1999, widespread viruses such as the Melissa virus appear to have been written chiefly as pranks.

Hostile intent related to vandalism can be found in programs designed to cause harm or data loss. Many DOS viruses, and the Windows ExploreZip worm, were designed to destroy files on a hard disk, or to corrupt the file system by writing junk data. Network-borne worms such as the 2001 Code Red worm or the Ramen worm fall into the same category. Designed to vandalize web pages, these worms may seem like the online equivalent to graffiti tagging, with the author’s alias or affinity group appearing everywhere the worm goes. However, since the rise of widespread broadband Internet access, malicious software has come to be designed for a profit motive, either more or less legal (forced advertising) or criminal.

Another strictly for-profit category of malware has emerged in spyware — programs designed to monitor users’ web browsing, display unsolicited advertisements, or redirect affiliate marketing revenues to the spyware creator. Spyware programs do not spread like viruses; they are generally installed by exploiting security holes or are packaged with user-installed software, such as peer-to-peer applications. It is not uncommon for spyware and advertising programs to install so many processes that the infected machine becomes unusable, defeating the intention of the attack.

The best-known types of malware, viruses and worms, are known for the manner in which they spread, rather than any other particular behavior. The term computer virus is used for a program which has infected some executable software and which causes that software, when run, to spread the virus to other executable software. Viruses may also contain a payload which performs other actions, often malicious. A worm, on the other hand, is a program which actively transmits itself over a network to infect other computers. It too may carry a payload. These definitions lead to the observation that a virus requires user intervention to spread, whereas a worm spreads automatically.

Some writers in the trade and popular press appear to misunderstand this distinction, and use the terms interchangeably.

How to counter such attacks?

As malware attacks become more frequent, attention has begun to shift from viruses and spyware protection, to malware protection, and programs have been developed to specifically combat them.

Lavasoft’s Ad-Aware SE and “Spybot – Search & Destroy” are examples of freeware program originally created to combat spyware and adware, but which also protects against some malware, viruses, and worms. Malwarebytes’ Anti-Malware is a shareware more focused on trojans, browser hijackers, and other malware, and which consequently roots out many kinds of malware that most other defensive programs won’t find. Anti-malware programs can combat malware in two ways:

1. They can provide real time protection against the installation of malware software on your computer. This type of spyware protection works the same way as that of anti-virus protection in that the anti-malware software scans all incoming network data for malware software and blocks any threats it comes across.

2. Anti-malware software programs can be used solely for detection and removal of malware software that has already been installed onto your computer. This type of malware protection is normally much easier to use and more popular. This type of anti-malware software scans the contents of the windows registry, operating system files, and installed programs on your computer and will provide a list of any threats found, allowing you to choose what you want to delete and what you want to keep, or compare this list to a list of known malware components, removing files which match.

Real-time protection from malware works identically to real-time anti-virus protection: the software scans disk files at download time, and blocks the activity of components known to represent malware.

7 worst habits of workaholics

It has been around 2 years since I joined the IT industry. For the first 10 months, I was really bored as I didn’t have much of work. Then, I started to get frustrated coz I felt I wasn’t given the amount and quality of work for which I was getting paid.

But, it was only since April this year that I got some real responsibilities. Then, I got power and I was satisfied. Slowly, I got more power and more responsibilities, and I was happy. Gradually, I became a workaholic.

It was only since the last 1 month that I started getting sick. I was hospitalized for about 2 weeks. Then, I made this research to find what went wrong. The following are the 7 worst habits of workaholics:

1. Forgetting to relax

 While some stress can be good because it keeps you alert and motivated, too much stress or chronic stress will take its toll on your body.

2. Eating on the go

Between meetings, conference calls and deadlines, workaholics forget to take out time to sit down for a healthy lunch. But a good meal is exactly what a person needs to stay mentally sharp throughout the day.

3. Putting off sleep for work

Even busy professionals need seven to nine hours of sleep every night. Missing out on sleep can lead to irritability, difficulty concentrating, memory problems and poor judgment. It has also been linked to obesity.

4. Not making time for exercise

Getting at least 30 minutes of exercise most days is very important to immediate and future health.

5. Working even when sick

Many people come to work despite being ill. But there are three common sense reasons to stay home — nobody wants your germs, you’ll be less productive and you need your rest to get better.

6. Drinking (too much)

Excessive drinking can lead to alcoholism, liver disease and some forms of cancer.

7. Skipping annual medical check-ups

In order to detect problems early, prevent others from developing and get the best treatment if you have a condition, you need to know what’s going on in your body.

Although, I had taken care of the last 3 points; I am yet to take care of the first 4. Once I take care of all 7 of these, I guess, I can call myself a healthy workaholic.

Countdown to the Safest Cars

7. Mercury Sable

Base MSRP:

$23,935.00

Base Invoice:

$22,096.00

Destination:

$800.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-6 Spd

Body Style:

4dr Car

Drive Type

Drivetrain-FWD

6. Honda Pilot

Base MSRP:

$27,595.00

Base Invoice:

$25,010.8

Destination:

$670.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-5 Spd

Body Style:

Sport Utility

Drive Type

Drivetrain-FWD

5. Infiniti FX

Base MSRP:

$38,050.00

Base Invoice:

$34,980.00

Destination:

$865.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-5 Spd

Body Style:

Sport Utility

Drive Type

Drivetrain-RWD

4. Lincoln Town Car

Base MSRP:

$45,295.00

Base Invoice:

$41,626.00

Destination:

$920.00

Engine:

Engine-8 Cyl

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-4 Spd

Body Style:

4dr Car

Drive Type

Drivetrain-RWD

3. Jeep Grand Cherokee

Base MSRP:

$29,420.00

Base Invoice:

$27,009.00

Destination:

$730.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-5 Spd

Body Style:

Sport Utility

Drive Type

Drivetrain-RWD

2. Jeep Commander

Base MSRP:

$28,330.00

Base Invoice:

$26,054.00

Destination:

$730.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-5 Spd

Body Style:

Sport Utility

Drive Type

Drivetrain-RWD

1. Ford Taurus

Base MSRP:

$23,635.00

Base Invoice:

$21,801.00

Destination:

$800.00

Engine:

Engine-6 Cyl-V6

Transmission

Transmission-Auto-6 Spd

Body Style:

4dr Car

Drive Type

Drivetrain-FWD