Barking cars don’t bite

How many times have you come across a car that is all bark and no bite?

In automotive terms, a “sleeper” is a car that doesn’t look like it’ll do much damage, but once it hits the road, it’s a real performance dream. Think of the Mazdaspeed3 or BMW 335D — two cars that don’t look all that vicious but are really stunning driver’s cars.

This article, however, lists cars which are just the opposite. These cars are stylistically overdone without the performance or quality to match the exterior shape. And while some of these cars aren’t that bad to drive, they still don’t live up to their exteriors.

7. Mitsubishi Eclipse

In the early 1990s, the Eclipse was a good choice for bargain enthusiasts. In recent years, though, the funny Mitsu has been plagued with horrible interior refinement and not-so-great driving dynamics. What a shame.

6. Saturn Sky

When General Motors launched the Sky roadster as the sister to the Solstice in 2006, we were greatly impressed with the bold exterior styling. But a Miata fighter? Hardly. The Sky is a portly roadster with a weak naturally aspirated engine and really poor interior materials.

5. Nissan Altima Coupe

A sporty two-door from Nissan that doesn’t wear a Z badge? Good thought, but the base car’s 2.5-liter four and CVT are really weak, and upgrading to the V-6 won’t help things all that much, either.

4. Ford Edge Sport

Twenty-two-inch chrome wheels and a revised front fascia aren’t sporty, but if “sportiness” and “tons of wind/road noise and harsh ride quality” go together in your book, we suppose it fits the bill.

3. Dodge Challenger SE

Like the V-6 Mustang, the Challenger’s muscle car exterior does very little to match the 3.5-liter V-6, horrible steering, bad transmission, and poor interior quality. A shame, because it’s such a looker.

2. Lexus IS250

The Lexus IS looks like it has the potential to be a pretty aggressive sport sedan poised to take on the BMW 3-Series. The 250, however, with its 2.5-liter V-6 and only 204 horsepower is a real slug with little to no driver involvement.

1. Nissan Rogue Krom

When Nissan did the Krom treatment to the Cube, it was cute and sort of fun. But the Rogue? Not so much. It might look sporty and crisp, but there’s an anemic four-cylinder engine and buzzy CVT under that hood.

Top 7 Worst Cars for your first date

One question that arises in our minds whenever we go out for a new or a blind date is: Which car should I drive in to her? Should I take my Rolls Royce, or just my Corolla will help me an impression? Many people will say they don’t care what kind of car someone drives.

It’s a lie. Particularly on blind dates, a new acquaintance will always judge you with harsh skepticism, and your mode of transportation will surely come under scrutiny. My answer: Whatever you drive, please avoid the ones listed here.

So, here is my countdown to the top 7 worst cars to go for a date -

7. Volkswagen New Beetle convertible

It’s less than impressive when you pick your date up in the same car she drove when she was 16

6. Mercedes Benz G-Class

Make sure to keep checking the rear view mirror and asking your date, “Do you think that guy is tailing us?”. This will only add to your mystique

5. Mazda MX-5

Sometimes you just want a date to end. That maybe difficult with such a joyful car. Your date won’t want to get out. And, be prepared to be asked, “Can I drive?”

4. Maybach Landaulet

If you want to flaunt your wealth, remember this: You can’t buy taste. Not even for $1.4million

3. Hummer H3

Both of you are likely to find those embarrassing “You park like a jerk” ticket on your windshield after a nice dinner

2. Ford Mustang V-6 5AT

It tells her you’re trying to look macho without actually being macho. And that, you can’t drive stick

1. Lincoln Town Car

Nothing like a random hop-in to ruin a good date. Please select a car that looks less like a cab

BMW ActiveHybrid X6 – The Ultimate Hybrid

The Ultimate Renaissance hereby presents the Ultimate Car. There are a lot of reasons for a driver to hate the idea of driving a hybrid car.

It’s the class of a car that has represented slowness, detachment, inelegant powertrain operation, and general lack of overall dynamism.

Crossovers have been questioned by enthusiasts on nearly the same level. Too big to be sporting, too low to be spacious, too heavy to be fast; CUVs are fish swimming in the same shooting barrel as hybrids for those who value the driving joy and purity. This brings us to the approximate phrase on many lips when the ActiveHybrid X6 was first proposed. We’ve always been put off by the often jerky transition from electric to gasoline power in most hybrids – a phenomenon that occurs in even well engineered systems like Toyota’s vaunted Synergy Drive. Working in tight concert with BMW’s impressive 4.4l bi-turbo V8 engine, the new X6’s electric motors help to achieve three very impressive figures: 480hp, 575pound-feet of torque, and a combined EPA consumption figure of 18 mpg. Considerable figures for what is now the closest thing to a performance hybrid the humans can buy on Earth.

If the 18mpg number isn’t good enough, then eat this. The X6 accelerates to 60mph in just 5.4 seconds. The engine seems to come to its own over 3000 rpm. What’s more, with the noted exception of that low-speed EV mode, BMW hasn’t hidden the voice of its first hybrid too much; a heavy foot on the throttle will be rewarded with a tuneful exhaust song. Not bad at all. BMW chose to launch the ActiveHybrid X6 in Miami, which is not one of the Great Driving cities. The ActiveHybrid stacks up against the standard V8 cars, which are almost 400 pounds lighter, in terms of handling. The X6 hybrid is a remarkable vehicle. It won’t make you love crossovers if you haven’t already – the shape and function are the same despite a cool signature color and nice optional packages. It will never boast of gaudy MPG figures. It might not even be the best X6 you can buy – the X6M is faster, the X6 35i is cheaper.

But, please don’t miss that this is absolutely a game-changing vehicle. The company may be turning out products that critics struggle to understand, but it has not forgotten the driving joy that it built a reputation on.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2010 MR Touring: The Beastly sedan

Mitsubishi had got a lot happening at its event in Palm Springs, California on last November. For those of you who haven’t heard, the new Touring version of the Evolution is aimed at a slightly more mature buyer than its big-winged brothers. The standard Evo’s tea-tray wing has been replaced here by a super subtle lip spoiler, making the car considerably less noticeable, right of the bat. Touring also receives a hot set of BBS wheels, a fully leather interior, a power sunroof, and heated Recaro buckets. Perhaps the most changing feature of the new Evo however, is the extra sound deadening material that has been stuffed in the car. One of our biggest gripes with previous Evolutions was the raucous exhaust note that came throbbing out of the tailpipe, no matter how one worked to keep the revs down.

We all love a spirited engine note as much as anyone-for a certain period of time. Touring has tackled this problem in a savvy way, leaving more than enough throatiness to enliven the senses, while seriously dialing back the low-speed thunder. It’s a compromise that we think makes the Evo a better all-around car. Thankfully, the loss of the huge wing and the addition of the sound-stopping stuff seemed to have more or less cancelled each other out from a weight standpoint. The new Evo is only about 30 pounds heavier than the standard MR, meaning the car feels as dynamically sound as ever. The Evo still felt hugely accelerative, sweet handing, and grippy. The only obvious downside of the MR Touring (other than the lack of a manual transmission, still available in the GSR only) is the pretty hefty price tag.

An MSRP of $40,990 brings the top-dog Lancer into the territory of some pretty refined competition. We have no problem seeing the Evo compete dynamically with the likes of BMW and Audi.

For more information on a previous version of this car, please have a look at the post: Cars for women – From a man’s standpoint.